
A Federal High Court in Abuja has warned that it may foreclose the defence of the detained leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, should he fail to open his case at the next adjourned date.
Justice James Omotosho issued the warning on Tuesday following Kanu’s continued refusal to enter his defence after the prosecution closed its case and the court dismissed his no-case submission.
The judge stated that if Kanu failed to open his defence on November 5, 2025, he would be deemed to have waived his right to do so, and the court would proceed accordingly.
The development came after the matter was adjourned on October 27 for the defendant to either file his final written address or open his defence.
At Tuesday’s sitting, Kanu, who has been conducting his own case without legal representation, told the court that he had not filed any final address as previously ordered but had instead submitted a motion and a supporting affidavit.
He insisted that he would not enter any defence, maintaining that there was no valid charge against him under any existing Nigerian law.
“There is no valid charge pending against me. I should not be in detention, and I demand to be released immediately,” Kanu told the court.
The prosecuting counsel, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), objected to Kanu’s submission, arguing that the documents he filed were not properly before the court.
Awomolo accused the defendant of deliberately delaying proceedings and urged the court to treat Kanu’s recent filings as his final written address so that both parties could adopt their positions and the matter be fixed for judgment.
Justice Omotosho, however, held that the documents filed by Kanu were in order and would be considered at the appropriate stage. He further noted that since Kanu is not a lawyer, he should be allowed to seek legal guidance before proceeding.
The Judge adjourned the case to November 5th.
				
Yoruba judge n prosecutor. This same people that has pathological hatred n jealousy for ndi igbo. Let see how it goes.
On what MNK is holding unto, the judge knows he’s right. The judge should vindicate MNK and his name will be written in the good book of history. And posterity will remember him as the judge who stood tall among his peers because some judges who handled the case before him were swallowed by political sharks. THE JUDGE SHOULD ALSO REMEMBER THAT A JUDGE HAD ONCE DISCHARGED AND ACQUITTED MNK OF ALL THE CHARGES LEVELLED AGAINST HIM. Today, he’s a happy judge.
A word is enough for the wise.