The Bola Tinubu-led federal government has rejected the European Union’s verdict on the recently concluded 2023 General Elections.
POLITICS NIGERIA reports that the announcement came through a press release by Dele Alake, the Special Adviser to the President, Sunday evening.
The federal government said it had previously alerted the nation to the intentions of a continental multi-lateral institution to discredit the 2023 general elections. Although not explicitly named in the earlier statement, the government said it was made clear that the foreign institution had persistently attacked the credibility of the electoral process and questioned Nigeria’s sovereignty and organisational capabilities.
Expressing outrage, the government said it finds it unacceptable that any foreign organisation can unilaterally impose its own standards and judgments on the credibility and transparency of Nigerian elections.
The federal government added that the 2023 general elections, particularly the presidential election won by President Bola Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC), were not only credible and peaceful but also the best-organized elections in Nigeria since 1999.
The presidency maintains a lack of substantial evidence provided by the European Union or any foreign or local organisation to undermine the integrity of the 2023 election results.
Furthermore, the government highlights that its previous assertion that the technology-aided 2023 general elections were the most transparent and well-organized since the return of civil rule has been corroborated by non-partisan foreign and local observers such as the African Union, ECOWAS, the Commonwealth Observer Mission, and the Nigerian Bar Association.
The full statement reads:
STATE HOUSE PRESS RELEASE
WE REJECT EUROPEAN UNION’S CONCLUSIONS ON 2023 GENERAL ELECTIONS
Sometimes in May, we alerted the nation, through a press statement, to the plan by a continental multi-lateral institution to discredit the 2023 general elections conducted by the Independent National Electoral Commission. The main target was the presidential election, clearly and fairly won by the then candidate of All Progressives Congress, Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
While we did not mention the name of the organisation in the said statement, we made it abundantly clear to Nigerians how this foreign institution had been unrelenting in its assault on the credibility of the electoral process, the sovereignty of our country and on our ability as a people to organise ourselves. We find it preposterous and unconscionable that in this day and age, any foreign organisation of whatever hue can continue to insist on its own yardstick and assessment as the only way to determine the credibility and transparency of our elections.
Now that the organisation has submitted what it claimed to be its final report on the elections, we can now categorically let Nigerians and the entire world know that we were not unaware of the machinations of the European Union to sustain its, largely, unfounded bias and claims on the election outcomes.
For emphasis, we want to reiterate that the 2023 general elections, most especially the presidential election, won by President Bola Tinubu/All Progressives Congress, were credible, peaceful, free, fair and the best organised general elections in Nigeria since 1999.
There is no substantial evidence provided by the European Union or any foreign and local organisation that is viable enough to impeach the integrity of the 2023 election outcomes.
It is worth restating that the limitation of EU final assessment and conclusions on our elections was made very bare in the text of the press conference addressed by the Head of its Electoral Observation Mission, Barry Andrews. While addressing journalists in Abuja on the so-called final report, Andrews noted that EU-EOM monitored the pre-election and post-election processes in Nigeria from January 11 to April 11, 2023 as an INEC accredited election monitoring group. Within this period, EU-EOM observed the elections through 11 Abuja-based analysts, and 40 election observers spread across 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory. With the level of personnel deployed, which was barely an average of one person per state, we wonder how EU-EOM independently monitored election in over 176,000 polling units across Nigeria.
We would like to know and even ask EU, how it reached the conclusions in the submitted final report with the very limited coverage of the elections by their observers who, without doubt, relied more on rumours, hearsay, cocktails of prejudiced and uninformed social media commentaries and opposition talking heads.
We are convinced that what EU-EOM called final report on our recent elections is a product of a poorly done desk job that relied heavily on few instances of skirmishes in less than 1000 polling units out of over 176,000 where Nigerians voted on election day.
We have many reasons to believe the jaundiced report, based on the views of fewer than 50 observers, was to merely sustain the same premature denunciatory stance contained in EU’s preliminary report released in March.
We strongly reject, in its entirety, any notion and idea from any organisation, group and individual remotely suggesting that the 2023 election was fraudulent.
Our earlier position that the technology-aided 2023 general elections were the most transparent and best organised elections since the return of civil rule in Nigeria has been validated by all non-partisan foreign and local observers such are the African Union, ECOWAS, Commonwealth Observer Mission and the Nigerian Bar Association.
Unlike EU-EOM that deployed fewer than 50 observers, the Nigerian Bar Association that sent out over 1000 observers spread across the entire country for same election gave a more holistic and accurate assessment of the elections in their own report.
NBA, an organisation of eminent lawyers and an important voice within the civic space, reported that 91.8 per cent of Nigerians rated the conduct of the national and state elections as credible and satisfactory. Any election that over 90% of the citizens considered transparent should be celebrated anywhere in the world.
It is heart-warming that INEC, through its National Commissioner for Information and Voter Education, Mr. Festus Okoye, has come out to defend the integrity of the election it conducted by rejecting the false narratives in the EU report.
It is also gratifying that the electoral umpire, as an institution that is open to learning and continuous improvements, has also committed to taking on board more ideas, innovation and reforms that will further enhance the integrity and credibility of our electoral process.
As a country, we have put the elections behind us. President Tinubu is facing the arduous task of nation-building, while those who have reasons to challenge the process continue to do so through the courts. In just one month in office, Nigerians appear satisfied with the decisive leadership of President Tinubu and the manner he is redirecting the country to the path of fiscal sustainability and socio-economic reforms. We urge the EU and other foreign interests to be objective in all their assessments of the internal affairs of our country and allow Nigeria to breathe.
Dele Alake
Special Adviser to the President
(Special Duties, Communications and Strategy)
July 2, 2023
It should be noted that the presidential election won by President Tinubu is being challenged by the candidate of the People’s Democratic Party, Atiku Abubakar and that of the Labour Party, Peter Obi.
Maybe they are unable to bribe them.
Dele Alake’s RESPONSE TO THE REPORT OF MYOPIC PARTISAN EU WITH SELF INTEREST IN Nigerian POLITICS IS INTRUCTIVE.
The UE and other western powers never really relent nor ever wished to release their MASTER image tendencies.
NO ONE BUYS THEIR BS ANYMORE AND SHOULD KEEP THEIR SLEFISH INTEREST NOSEY PUNCHES AWAY FROM Nigeria.
This comment is devoid of any logic. EU didn’t impose itself on Nigeria as election observer but they were invited and accredited for that purpose. Now that their report has not endorsed the interest of Alake and Co, the reason for the rejection. Responsible government in saner climes would have taken the report and respond adequately with facts to any grey areas rather than this gibberish from Alake.
I thought so too. No empirical evidence on the part of the FG to show the elections were transparent.
My the guilts will always attack to cover up. We are waiting for Court’s judgement.
It is pathetic how people placed in the helm of affairs reason sometimes. If you can prove your defense that the election was transperent , Nigerians will throw stones at EU observers but ofcourae u can’t hoodwink us Mr Alake
If you say 91.8% of Nigerians agreed that the concluded presidential elections in Nigeria was free and fare, then you must be the world best joker that ever walked the earth. I believe what you meant to say is 91.8% of Nigerians disagreed with the outcome of the February presidential elections in Nigeria.
Where they not officially invited by the same federal government? The government should had taken their time to look into the report, sift out what is beneficial and work on the grew areas the EU pointed out. If some people in government and the government itself didn’t see anything wrong in the election (SELECTION), the generality of Nigerians thinks otherwise. Let any government agency carry out a public interview on the elections and see what majority of Nigerians will say.
They’re rejecting the EU report, but same government officials who are rejecting the EU election report are same government officials that are junketing and traveling to these EU countries for medical check up. If the EU writes a report on our medical facilities, maybe the government will also reject it and say it’s in top shape.
May God help us with good, honest and, transparent leaders.