A court in Rivers State has dismissed a lawsuit seeking to replace 27 lawmakers in the state House of Assembly who are loyal to former governor Nyesom Wike.
The suit aimed to challenge the legitimacy of these legislators, alleging that their allegiance to Wike compromised their roles.
In a statement following the ruling, a court spokesperson said, “The evidence presented did not sufficiently warrant the removal of the lawmakers. They have the right to serve their constituents without undue interference.”
The court’s decision has been met with mixed reactions, with supporters of Wike viewing it as a victory for democratic representation.
Opponents, however, expressed disappointment, claiming that the lawmakers’ loyalty to Wike undermines the assembly’s independence.
One critic stated, “This ruling is a setback for accountability in governance. The people of Rivers State deserve representatives who prioritise their interests over partisan loyalty.”
The outcome is expected to impact the political landscape in Rivers, as Wike’s influence remains significant in the region.
Observers are now watching closely to see how this ruling will affect future political alignments and legislative actions within the assembly.
