Advertisement
Politics

COVID-19: Buhari’s Lockdown of Lagos, Ogun Unconstitutional – Soyinka

Advertisement

Nobel laureate Prof. Wole Soyinka has reacted to President Muhammadu Buhari’s directive to restrict all movement in Ogun, Lagos and Abuja for 2 weeks in a bid to contain the spread of COVID-19.

In a statement on Monday, Soyinka berated the President for giving out such directive, adding that the Nigerian leader has to consult with the National Assembly before making such an order.

He described the total lockdown of the tow states and FCT as illegal and unconstitutional.

According to the Nobel laureate, the president did not have the power to unilaterally lockdown a state, as there was no war or emergency.

He wrote: “All constitutional lawyers and our elected representatives should kindly step into “this and educate us, mere lay minds. The worst development I can conceive us is to have a situation where rational measures for the containment of the Corona pandemic are rejected on account of their questionable genesis.

“This is a time for Unity of Purpose, not nitpicking dissensions. So, before this becomes a habit, a question: does President Buhari have the powers to close down state borders? We want clear answers. We are not in a war emergency.

“Appropriately focussed on measures for the saving lives, and committed to making sacrifices for the preservation of our communities, we should nonetheless remain alert to any encroachment on constitutionally demarcated powers. We need to exercise collective vigilance, and not compromise the future by submitting to interventions that are not backed by law and constitution.”

According to Soyinka, a president who had been conspicuously AWOL, the Rip van Winkle of Nigerian history, was now alleged to have woken up after a prolonged siesta, and begun to issue orders.

He asked: “Who actually instigates these orders anyway? From where do they really emerge? What happens when the orders conflict with state measures, the product of a systematic containment strategy – `including even trial-and-error and hiccups – undertaken without let or leave of the Centre. So far, the anti-COVID-19 measures have proceeded along the rails of decentralised thinking, multilateral collaboration and technical exchanges between states.

“The Centre is obviously part of the entire process, and one expects this to be the norm, even without the epidemic’s frontal assault on the Presidency itself. Indeed, the Centre is expected to drive the overall effort, but in collaboration, with extraordinary budgeting and refurbishing of facilities.

“The universal imperative and urgency of this affliction should not become an opportunistic launch pad for a sneak RE-CENTRALISATION, no matter how seemingly insignificant its appearance. I urge governors and legislators to be especially watchful. No epidemic is ever cured with constitutional piracy. It only lays down new political viruses for the future.”

Advertisement
Show More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button